Draco & Company: Court Of Records Archives ~ Collection of Motions Filed in State of Texas v. [Draco] – Oct. 2, 2025

Description:

This archive contains a consolidated set of eight legal filings submitted on October 2, 2025, to County Court at Law No. 5, Montgomery County, Texas, in the matter of *State of Texas v. [Defendant's Name or Initials]*. These motions were filed as part of an ongoing criminal case and raise serious procedural, constitutional, and evidentiary concerns. The filings reflect the Defendant’s pro se efforts to ensure due process, correct false records, and compel proper legal conduct from both the court and prosecuting agencies.

Each motion is fully timestamped and e-filed, with case numbers and identifying information included in the merged PDF. The motions are listed below with a brief summary:

Contents:

1. DA-MCTX-Efile-CC5-RECUSE-10_02_2025 
[MOTION TO RECUSE ACTING JUDGE KEITH STEWART]

Comments to Court:

This filing is a Motion to Recuse Acting Judge Keith Stewart pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 18b(2)(a), on the grounds that the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned due to a pattern of procedural irregularities, false factual findings, and denial of due process. Supporting facts are detailed in the motion. The Defendant respectfully requests immediate consideration and reassignment in accordance with the law.

2. DA-MCTX-Efile-CC5-QuashWarrant-10_02_2025 
[MOTION TO QUASH WARRANT AND RESTORE BOND]

Comments to Court:

This filing is a Motion to Quash Warrant based on verified evidence that the Defendant was present in court on the date in question, contrary to the claims that led to the issuance of the warrant. The motion outlines procedural errors, misrepresentations in the record, and violations of due process. Immediate review is requested to prevent further harm from an improperly issued warrant.

3. DA-MCTX-Efile-CC5-DISCOVERY-10_02_2025 
[MOTION FOR DISCOVERY OF COMPLETE CASE MATERIALS]

Comments to Court:

This motion requests full discovery of all case materials, records, and communications related to the Defendant’s arrest on August 7, 2019. The request includes documentation from the District Attorney’s Office, Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office, and any other involved parties. This filing is made to ensure the Defendant’s constitutional right to access evidence, prepare a proper defense, and identify any procedural or legal irregularities on record.

4. DA-MCTX-Efile-CC5-VerifiedFacts-10_02_2025 
[MOTION TO ACCEPT VERIFIED STATEMENT OF FACTS AND REQUIRE REBUTTAL BY OPPOSING PARTY]

Comments to Court:
This motion requests that the court formally accept the attached Verified Statement of Facts into the official record and require any opposing party to file a timely rebuttal under oath. The facts submitted are material, unrebutted, and supported by firsthand knowledge. Absent lawful and specific rebuttal, they should be deemed judicially noticed and established for the purpose of all related proceedings.

5. DA-MCTX-Efile-CC5-VerifiedFacts-ExhibitA-10_02_2025 
[Exhibit A- Verified Statement of Facts in Support of Motion]

Comments to Court:
Submitted as Exhibit A in support of the accompanying Motion to Accept Verified Statement of Facts. This document presents firsthand, unrebutted facts material to the case, entered under penalty of perjury, and is submitted for entry into the official record. Requesting judicial notice and acknowledgment absent lawful rebuttal.

6. DA-MCTX-Efile-CC5-CourtTranscripts-10_02_2025 
[Motion to Compel Production of Court Transcripts and Request for Affidavits]

Comments to Court:

This motion seeks a formal court order compelling production of all transcripts from the September 30, 2019 court session, as well as affidavits from court personnel who have acknowledged the Defendant’s presence that day. These materials are essential for establishing the factual record, challenging a fraudulent Failure to Appear, and correcting procedural errors that have resulted in ongoing legal harm.

7. DA-MCTX-Efile-CC5-VerifyRights-10_02_2025 
[MOTION TO VERIFY RECOGNITION AND PROTECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS]

This motion formally asserts and seeks acknowledgment of the Defendant’s protected constitutional rights under the U.S. and Texas Constitutions. The Court is respectfully requested to verify on record that all proceedings, actions, and agents involved have complied—and will continue to comply—with these rights. This includes due process, equal protection, right to counsel, and the prohibition of unlawful deprivation or coercion.

8. DA-MCTX-Efile-CC5-CompelClerk-10_02_2025 
[MOTION TO COMPEL CLERK TO EXPLAIN RECORD IRREGULARITIES]

Comments to Court:
This motion seeks a formal explanation and clarification from the Clerk regarding multiple irregularities observed in the official court record, including inconsistent entries, missing timestamps, and conflicting documentation. The Defendant respectfully requests that the Court compel the Clerk to provide sworn statements or written clarification to ensure the integrity, accuracy, and transparency of the record.

Purpose and Public Interest:

These filings are archived in the public interest to document and expose potential procedural misconduct, denial of rights, and judicial irregularities in the Texas criminal justice system. They may be of interest to legal scholars, civil rights advocates, and individuals researching pro se defense efforts and accountability in court proceedings.

But make no mistake — this archive is also a record of a six-year fight against a broken and corrupt system that has tried to crush me for its own financial and political gain. I’ve been ghosted by court-appointed attorneys who never once acted in my defense, stonewalled by officials hiding information, and subjected to a legal process where fairness is a hollow promise.

This is not just legal documentation; it’s self-preservation and resistance. It stands as raw proof of how the system weaponizes its power against those it claims to serve. For anyone seeking the unvarnished truth about systemic failure, abuse of power, and a lone individual’s fight for justice, this archive tells that story — unapologetically and without compromise.